<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://sap.sys-con.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>SAP Viewpoint</title>
 <link>http://sap.sys-con.com/</link>
 <description>Latest articles from SAP Viewpoint</description>
 <language>en</language>
 <copyright>Copyright 2009 Ulitzer.com</copyright>
 <generator>Ulitzer.com</generator>
 <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:13:18 EST</lastBuildDate>
 <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
 <ttl>10</ttl>
<item>
 <title>The Seven Deadly Sins of Software Test Automation</title>
 <link>http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1192917</link>
 <description>For the past 15-plus years, organisations have turned to test automation as a way to improve efficiency in the Software Development Life Cycle. Yet despite heavy investment, software testing is still often the bottleneck in the delivery cycle. In a recent survey of CIOs, Original Software found that only 6% were totally happy with their automation. The scary thing is that this is tolerated - It’s the norm!&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1192917&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:45:00 EST</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1192917</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Is Your SOA Hammer Looking for a Nail?</title>
 <link>http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1044541</link>
 <description>ZapThink considers the SOA business case as an essential SOA artifact. Architects must have a clear picture of the business motivations for SOA, not only at the beginning of the initiative, but also as the architecture rolls out. Nevertheless, there is still frequently a disconnect between the business problems and the SOA approach. The challenge here is that the architects -- or more broadly, the entire SOA team -- are only one part of the bigger picture, especially in large organizations. In the enterprise context, how the business asks for IT capabilities in the broad sense is often at the root of the issue. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1044541&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:30:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1044541</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SAP Borrows Microsoft’s Software-Plus-Services Approach</title>
 <link>http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1008519</link>
 <description>SAP has a new on-demand plan. First of all it’s for the large enterprise, its existing customers, not the mid-market it’s been lackadaisically offering its never-completely-released isolated-tenancy on-demand ERP widgetry, ByDesign. 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1008519&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://sap.sys-con.com/node/1008519</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>McKinsey &amp; Co - Clearing the Air on Cloud Computing</title>
 <link>http://sap.sys-con.com/node/922802</link>
 <description>Late last year I received a phone call from McKinsey &amp; Co in regards to helping provide some insights into the cost benefits of moving to a cloud computing environment. For one reason or another we were not able to connect to complete the discussion, which after the last couple days seems like a shame because that very report has been generating a tonne of buzz. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sap.sys-con.com/node/922802&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EDT</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="true">http://sap.sys-con.com/node/922802</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
