Welcome!

SAP Authors: Liz McMillan, Elizabeth White, Dana Gardner, Cynthia Dunlop, Carmen Gonzalez

Related Topics: PowerBuilder, SAP

PowerBuilder: Article

PowerBuilder Developer’s Conference

This year all of the other Sybase products were incorporated in SAP TechEd

As you probably know, in lieu of a TechWave this year SAP hosted a separate PowerBuilder Developer's Conference (PBDC) co-located with SAP TechEd 2012 in Las Vegas from October 21-25. There was a separate but co-located event last year as well, but that was an actual TechWave that represented all of the Sybase products. This year all of the other Sybase products were incorporated in SAP TechEd, so the only products covered during the PBDC was PowerBuilder. (Actually among the 30+ sessions, PowerDesigner and SQL Anywhere were mentioned in one session, there was a session on InfoMaker and there was one session on SQL Anywhere Tips and Techniques.) There were roughly 90+ people in attendance, compared to 600+ at the last TechWave. The registration area for TechEd was the standard conference registration booths. The registration area for the PBDC was a single skirted table. In that regard it gave it a bit more of a roadshow feel than a full-on conference. In other regards though, as I'll cover later, it was a full-on conference event.

On the TechEd side, there were 1,426 sessions and 6,000+ attendees. With regard to Sybase products, the number of sessions that indicated they covered a particular product was as follows:

PowerDesigner

23

SQL Anywhere

20

Adaptive Server Enterprise

63

Replication Server

21

Sybase IQ

65

Afaria

35

Sybase Unwired Platform

79

Sybase 365

3

Clearly, Sybase products are getting good coverage in the TechEd event. Of course, there were 673 sessions covering NetWeaver and 365 covering HANA.

Being held in October, it was even later than last year's event which was the latest in the year that I can recall TechWave ever being held. As I've requested they do with TechWave for some time, SAP announced the date and location of next year's North American based TechEd, which will also be in Las Vegas in October. People need as much advance notice as they can for these things, particularly in a tight economy, to request approval and budget for them. If we'd had that much prior notice for the PBDC (it wasn't announced until late June, and we couldn't register until early August), we might have had an even better turnout. Whether or not there will be another separate PBDC next year, or if it might be a separate event, is still up in the air right now.

The schedule was much the same as last year: pre-conference courses on Sunday and Monday, general sessions on Tuesday, breakout sessions on Wednesday and Thursday and a special event Thursday night. This year there were no sessions on Friday, just a ‘meet the experts' brunch, which I think was a good move.

As with last year, the breakout sessions were 60 minutes long. However, this year perhaps they took my suggestion from last year as there was a 15-minute break between sessions. Great, because the person presenting before the first session I presented ran late and yet I was still able to set up and be ready on time without being rushed.

This year no PowerBuilder-based applications qualified for Demo Jam (Ronnie Po took second place with his PowerBuilder-based application last year). New this year was the incorporation of PowerBuilder as a tool that could be used in the pre-conference Inno Jam. Unfortunately I wasn't able to make that because of getting a somewhat late notice of the opportunity as I hadn't planned to come up for the pre-conference events. (The extra cost was also a factor given I'm of Scottish descent....) However, none of the teams ended up using PowerBuilder. It's largely because of the nature of the teams. They are randomly assigned and apparently include a number of non-developers. The event would make more sense to me if you could pre-arrange teams with other people you knew were coming that used the same toolset (and who were actually developers).

With regard to some of my other suggestions from last year:

  • Location, location, location. I indicated that I hate Las Vegas as a conference location, and this year's event didn't change that. However, as long as the event is co-located with SAP TechEd, it will probably remain there at least for a while.
  • Power. Didn't see much improvement there at the PBDC. I was also in one TechEd session that was standing room only and few outlets. However, there were some locations in TechEd where there were tables we could sit at and they did have an outlet strip on every table. There were also charging stations in the exhibit hall.
  • Internet Access. Still no wired access for the speakers in the presentations rooms. However, I was able to do my web services demos using the wireless access. It was spotty at times during the conference, but at least worked during the demos.

The great thing about being co-located with SAP TechEd is that we get to take advantage of some of the features of a ‘big conference', e.g. a large networking reception and a top-of-the-line special event. Last year when we had a floor to ourselves and a more conference like registration area the difference between the events didn't stand out so much. This year the PBDC was held in one hallway of the main floor, and it the difference between the events was much more noticeable. I was badged for both events though, so I might have noticed it more than most PBDC attendees. In fact, I spent most of my time with SAP TechEd events (primarily with SAP Mentor meetings with SAP executives), so I don't have a good feel for how most of the PBDC sessions went or how many of the attendees felt about the conference.

That brings up the question about whether PBDC should continue on as a separate co-located event, move to a separate event, or simply merge into TechEd. One would think that at some point SAP would want their PowerBuilder customers checking out their other products, and would want their customers of other products to find out more about PowerBuilder. The latter was actually supposed to be able to happen this year, as people with SAP TechEd badges were supposed to be able to get into PBDC sessions as long a room allowed. When I first attempted that though with just my SAP TechEd badge, the security at the door turned me away until I got a PBDC badge (actually it was the color of the lanyard that differed, the badge was the same). So apparently there was some miscommunication. I'm not sure how SAP TechEd attendees would learn about the opportunity though, given how separate the events were run.

Combining the events makes sense from that regard. The number of sessions for other Sybase products argues that PowerBuilder wouldn't be neglected if we merged into the main TechEd event. I've had that experience with Flex at Adobe Max, where I had trouble finding sessions I was interested in that justified my going. I did hear from some of the TeamSybase members attending SAP TechEd sessions that the other Sybase products session weren't as much of a technical deep dive as they're used to, perhaps because the audience might contain more people who aren't as familiar with the products. I also wonder whether combining PowerBuilder into TechEd might make PowerBuilder sessions available in the non-North American locations. SAP holds several TechEds each year in addition to North America: one in Europe, one in India and one in China. If PowerBuilder remained a separate North American event, I don't see PowerBuilder sessions being incorporated into the other TechEds. But if it was one event, then we should be able to have PowerBuilder sessions in those other TechEds. For example, for the SAP TechEd in Madrid, the breakdown of sessions that reference other Sybase products are:

PowerDesigner

4

SQL Anywhere

1

Adaptive Server Enterprise

17

Replication Server

15

Sybase IQ

12

Afaria

25

Sybase Unwired Platform

40

Sybase 365

0

PowerBuilder

0

The main disadvantage is cost. The registration price for SAP TechEd is roughly twice the cost of the PBDC. That and I guess I'll have to live with having it in Las Vegas for a while longer (unless I want to pony up the money for travel to one of the non-North American locations).

If it was held as a separate event, we might lose some of the ‘big-conference' advantages. We'd also lose the opportunity to cross-pollinate with other SAP customers and perhaps not have the options to see PowerBuilder sessions in TechEds. The main advantages are that we wouldn't be overshadowed by TechEd and the cost would remain the same. We might have more control over the location though.

Or, it could continue to be a co-located event. That should keep costs the same. It wouldn't allow PowerBuilder customers to learn too much about SAP products, since they couldn't attend TechEd sessions. And the communication issues (and visibility) would have to be addressed to make sure TechEd attendees knew about PowerBuilder sessions availability. It also still doesn't address PowerBuilder sessions in non-North American locations. And we'd still be in Las Vegas for a while.

I like some of the advantages of being fully integrated into TechEd. However, given that as an SAP Mentor my registration is covered by SAP, I'm not sure I'm qualified to evaluate the impact of the higher registration cost. Also, given that at least at this co-located event I spend most of my time at TechEd, I'm not sure I can properly evaluate how most PBDC attendees would feel about that kind of change. Send me an email or, better yet, comment here, I'd like to see what you think.

More Stories By Bruce Armstrong

Bruce Armstrong is a development lead with Integrated Data Services (www.get-integrated.com). A charter member of TeamSybase, he has been using PowerBuilder since version 1.0.B. He was a contributing author to SYS-CON's PowerBuilder 4.0 Secrets of the Masters and the editor of SAMs' PowerBuilder 9: Advanced Client/Server Development.

Comments (0)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


@ThingsExpo Stories
Connected devices and the Internet of Things are getting significant momentum in 2014. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Hunter, Chief Scientist & Technology Evangelist at Greenwave Systems, examined three key elements that together will drive mass adoption of the IoT before the end of 2015. The first element is the recent advent of robust open source protocols (like AllJoyn and WebRTC) that facilitate M2M communication. The second is broad availability of flexible, cost-effective storage designed to handle the massive surge in back-end data in a world where timely analytics is e...
The Internet of Things will put IT to its ultimate test by creating infinite new opportunities to digitize products and services, generate and analyze new data to improve customer satisfaction, and discover new ways to gain a competitive advantage across nearly every industry. In order to help corporate business units to capitalize on the rapidly evolving IoT opportunities, IT must stand up to a new set of challenges. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Jeff Kaplan, Managing Director of THINKstrategies, will examine why IT must finally fulfill its role in support of its SBUs or face a new round of...
How do APIs and IoT relate? The answer is not as simple as merely adding an API on top of a dumb device, but rather about understanding the architectural patterns for implementing an IoT fabric. There are typically two or three trends: Exposing the device to a management framework Exposing that management framework to a business centric logic Exposing that business layer and data to end users. This last trend is the IoT stack, which involves a new shift in the separation of what stuff happens, where data lives and where the interface lies. For instance, it's a mix of architectural styles ...
We are reaching the end of the beginning with WebRTC, and real systems using this technology have begun to appear. One challenge that faces every WebRTC deployment (in some form or another) is identity management. For example, if you have an existing service – possibly built on a variety of different PaaS/SaaS offerings – and you want to add real-time communications you are faced with a challenge relating to user management, authentication, authorization, and validation. Service providers will want to use their existing identities, but these will have credentials already that are (hopefully) i...
Cultural, regulatory, environmental, political and economic (CREPE) conditions over the past decade are creating cross-industry solution spaces that require processes and technologies from both the Internet of Things (IoT), and Data Management and Analytics (DMA). These solution spaces are evolving into Sensor Analytics Ecosystems (SAE) that represent significant new opportunities for organizations of all types. Public Utilities throughout the world, providing electricity, natural gas and water, are pursuing SmartGrid initiatives that represent one of the more mature examples of SAE. We have s...
"Matrix is an ambitious open standard and implementation that's set up to break down the fragmentation problems that exist in IP messaging and VoIP communication," explained John Woolf, Technical Evangelist at Matrix, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at @ThingsExpo, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The Internet of Things will greatly expand the opportunities for data collection and new business models driven off of that data. In her session at @ThingsExpo, Esmeralda Swartz, CMO of MetraTech, discussed how for this to be effective you not only need to have infrastructure and operational models capable of utilizing this new phenomenon, but increasingly service providers will need to convince a skeptical public to participate. Get ready to show them the money!
One of the biggest challenges when developing connected devices is identifying user value and delivering it through successful user experiences. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Mike Kuniavsky, Principal Scientist, Innovation Services at PARC, described an IoT-specific approach to user experience design that combines approaches from interaction design, industrial design and service design to create experiences that go beyond simple connected gadgets to create lasting, multi-device experiences grounded in people's real needs and desires.
P2P RTC will impact the landscape of communications, shifting from traditional telephony style communications models to OTT (Over-The-Top) cloud assisted & PaaS (Platform as a Service) communication services. The P2P shift will impact many areas of our lives, from mobile communication, human interactive web services, RTC and telephony infrastructure, user federation, security and privacy implications, business costs, and scalability. In his session at @ThingsExpo, Robin Raymond, Chief Architect at Hookflash, will walk through the shifting landscape of traditional telephone and voice services ...
Scott Jenson leads a project called The Physical Web within the Chrome team at Google. Project members are working to take the scalability and openness of the web and use it to talk to the exponentially exploding range of smart devices. Nearly every company today working on the IoT comes up with the same basic solution: use my server and you'll be fine. But if we really believe there will be trillions of these devices, that just can't scale. We need a system that is open a scalable and by using the URL as a basic building block, we open this up and get the same resilience that the web enjoys.
The Internet of Things is tied together with a thin strand that is known as time. Coincidentally, at the core of nearly all data analytics is a timestamp. When working with time series data there are a few core principles that everyone should consider, especially across datasets where time is the common boundary. In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, Jim Scott, Director of Enterprise Strategy & Architecture at MapR Technologies, discussed single-value, geo-spatial, and log time series data. By focusing on enterprise applications and the data center, he will use OpenTSDB as an example t...
The Domain Name Service (DNS) is one of the most important components in networking infrastructure, enabling users and services to access applications by translating URLs (names) into IP addresses (numbers). Because every icon and URL and all embedded content on a website requires a DNS lookup loading complex sites necessitates hundreds of DNS queries. In addition, as more internet-enabled ‘Things' get connected, people will rely on DNS to name and find their fridges, toasters and toilets. According to a recent IDG Research Services Survey this rate of traffic will only grow. What's driving t...
Enthusiasm for the Internet of Things has reached an all-time high. In 2013 alone, venture capitalists spent more than $1 billion dollars investing in the IoT space. With "smart" appliances and devices, IoT covers wearable smart devices, cloud services to hardware companies. Nest, a Google company, detects temperatures inside homes and automatically adjusts it by tracking its user's habit. These technologies are quickly developing and with it come challenges such as bridging infrastructure gaps, abiding by privacy concerns and making the concept a reality. These challenges can't be addressed w...
Explosive growth in connected devices. Enormous amounts of data for collection and analysis. Critical use of data for split-second decision making and actionable information. All three are factors in making the Internet of Things a reality. Yet, any one factor would have an IT organization pondering its infrastructure strategy. How should your organization enhance its IT framework to enable an Internet of Things implementation? In his session at Internet of @ThingsExpo, James Kirkland, Chief Architect for the Internet of Things and Intelligent Systems at Red Hat, described how to revolutioniz...
Bit6 today issued a challenge to the technology community implementing Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). To leap beyond WebRTC’s significant limitations and fully leverage its underlying value to accelerate innovation, application developers need to consider the entire communications ecosystem.
The definition of IoT is not new, in fact it’s been around for over a decade. What has changed is the public's awareness that the technology we use on a daily basis has caught up on the vision of an always on, always connected world. If you look into the details of what comprises the IoT, you’ll see that it includes everything from cloud computing, Big Data analytics, “Things,” Web communication, applications, network, storage, etc. It is essentially including everything connected online from hardware to software, or as we like to say, it’s an Internet of many different things. The difference ...
Cloud Expo 2014 TV commercials will feature @ThingsExpo, which was launched in June, 2014 at New York City's Javits Center as the largest 'Internet of Things' event in the world.
SYS-CON Events announced today that Windstream, a leading provider of advanced network and cloud communications, has been named “Silver Sponsor” of SYS-CON's 16th International Cloud Expo®, which will take place on June 9–11, 2015, at the Javits Center in New York, NY. Windstream (Nasdaq: WIN), a FORTUNE 500 and S&P 500 company, is a leading provider of advanced network communications, including cloud computing and managed services, to businesses nationwide. The company also offers broadband, phone and digital TV services to consumers primarily in rural areas.
"There is a natural synchronization between the business models, the IoT is there to support ,” explained Brendan O'Brien, Co-founder and Chief Architect of Aria Systems, in this SYS-CON.tv interview at the 15th International Cloud Expo®, held Nov 4–6, 2014, at the Santa Clara Convention Center in Santa Clara, CA.
The major cloud platforms defy a simple, side-by-side analysis. Each of the major IaaS public-cloud platforms offers their own unique strengths and functionality. Options for on-site private cloud are diverse as well, and must be designed and deployed while taking existing legacy architecture and infrastructure into account. Then the reality is that most enterprises are embarking on a hybrid cloud strategy and programs. In this Power Panel at 15th Cloud Expo (http://www.CloudComputingExpo.com), moderated by Ashar Baig, Research Director, Cloud, at Gigaom Research, Nate Gordon, Director of T...